Wie regeert nu werkelijk de wereld? Carrol Quiqley, in zijn boek The Anglo-American Establishment, lichte als eerste een tipje van de sluier op. Quigley echter maakte zelf deel uit van de wereld die hij in het boek beschreef, en liet dan ook niet het achterste van de tong zien. Richard Poe, in een bijzonder fascinerende artikelenreeks, licht nu die sluier verder op. Zijn vinger wijst naar de Anglo, in de Anglo-American Establishment. In zijn ogen zijn het de Britten - en dan met name de City of Londen en het Britse Koningshuis - die op geheime en niet zo geheime manier aan de touwtjes trekken. De Amerikanen worden enkel maar op sleeptouw genomen, net zoals de Zionisten, en de communisten, en George Soros.

Poe legt alles uit in deze podcast met Noor Bin Laden:

In het volgend artikel legt hij uit hoe de Britten het communisme creëerden: 

How the British Invented Communism (And Blamed It on the Jews)

Was the Bolshevik Revolution fake? Was Lenin’s 1917 coup little more than a “color revolution,” a staged event, orchestrated by foreign intelligence services? Strong evidence suggests that it was. In the 1920s, prominent Russian exiles accused Great Britain of plotting the Tsar’s downfall. George Buchanan, British ambassador to Russia from 1910 to 1918, devoted 16 pages of his 1923 memoir to denying this charge. But the charge was true. The British secret services had destabilized Russia, just as they had previously destabilized France in 1789. They had infiltrated and weaponized the Bolsheviks, just as they had previously weaponized the Jacobin movement against Louis XVI. While the Tsar was technically Britain’s ally in World War I, British elites feared that a victorious Russia would threaten Britain’s global dominance. Bolshevism provided the solution, demolishing the Tsar’s once-mighty empire, and plunging Russia into chaos and civil war.

In het artikel How the British Caused the American Civil War beschrijft hij hoe de Britten achter de Amerikaanse burgeroorlog zaten, aangezien de V.S. zich te onafhankelijk begonnen op te stellen, en ze het zuiden als wingebeid dreigden te verliezen. Het plan was om de V.S. in minstens twee delen op te splitsen. 

Great Britain was the true instigator of the Southern rebellion. Following the American Revolution, the British managed to reestablish a colonial economy over the South, whereby Southern states sold 70 percent of their cotton exports to England, while purchasing British manufactured goods in return. The North sought to replace England as the South’s leading trade partner, by imposing tariffs on foreign trade, but the British fought back. British agents stirred up secession in the South, while British statesmen promised diplomatic and military support to rebel leaders. The British plan was to carve up the United States into spheres of influence, to be divided among European powers. They were thwarted only by the intervention of the Russian Tsar, Alexander II, who sent two fleets in 1863, one to New York and the other to San Francisco, warning the British against any attempt to break the Union naval blockade, as they had planned to do. Once widely known to Americans, these facts have been wiped from our history books.

In het volgend artikel wordt uit de doeken gedaan hoe George Soros plotseling op het toneel verscheen:

Is Soros really the Puppetmaster? Or is he just a psyop, a front for British economic warfare operations? The man who created the Soros legend was Lord William Rees-Mogg: prominent British journalist; friend and confidant of the Royal Family; close friend and business associate of Lord Jacob Rothschild; and father of British politician Jacob Rees-Mogg.

De Britten zaten ook achter de zogenaamde "kleurenrevoluties":

As the British Empire shifted from a colonial to a neocolonial system, it had to develop quieter, more discreet methods for removing rebellious vassals.

Ten slotte waren de Britten de uitvinders van het "globalisme" en kregen ze uiteindelijk de Amerikanen mee op sleeptouw:

The CFR grew out of the British Round Table Movement.

In my last article, “How the British Invented Globalism,” I explained how British leaders began formulating plans for global government during the 19th century.

With funding from the Rhodes Trust, a secretive group called the Round Table was formed in 1909. It planted chapters in English-speaking countries, including the USA, to propagandize for a worldwide federation of English-speaking peoples united in a single superstate.

The Round Table’s long-term goal — as Cecil Rhodes made clear in his 1877 will — was to achieve world peace through British hegemony.

In the process, Rhodes also sought (and I quote) the “ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire.”

De Britten waren ook de uitvinders van het Zionisme, zoals verder uit de doeken gedaan door Mark Burdman.

Het thesis van Richard Poe wordt verder ook bevestigd door commentator Erik Carlson die schrijft voor Badlandsmedia. Ook hij heeft een artikel over George Soros als een Britse "creatie", ook bedoeld om de Verenigde Staten stevig onder de Britse knoet te houden:

George Soros is portrayed as being an investment genius, and much of this lore stems from what was known as “the breaking of the English pound” in 1992. (Early 1990’s again). In 1992, Soros made around $2 billion by shorting the British Pound. He became known as “the man who broke the Bank of England”. The problem with this narrative is that others made even more off this “short” … much more, including J.P. Morgan, but they kept it a secret, while Soros was paraded around for his achievement. By the way, some claim J.P. Morgan is a front for British investors in America. This may be why they couldn’t brag about what they had done.

In The British Cabal doet hij de zaak net zoals Poe, maar dan wat bondiger, meer algemeen uit de doeken:

Let me ask a question: do people really believe our forefathers risked everything, life and limb, to fight against a tea-tax?

Or do you think it was much more than that—that the British were actually much more sinister, cruel and controlling? Is it possible the Americans viewed their British controllers as a Globalist, Satanic cult? Actually, while I’m at it, what is the difference between Colonialism and modern-day Globalism?

There is a saying that the victors of war write history.

In WWI and WWII, the allies came off as smelling like roses, while the Germans and Nazis came off as being less than human in their evil. When the British lost the American Revolutionary War, if they lost all control and influence over America, how is it they were able to control the narrative of the war? In other words, If America won the war and gained complete independence from England, why don’t our history books really play up how evil England really was? Instead, we get the expensive tea narrative.

Pre-American Revolutionary War, England didn’t allow Americans to manufacture, anything. Big or small, for domestic use or export, Americans were forbidden to manufacture finished goods of any kind. Americans, especially in the South, could produce commodities such as cotton, which would be sent to England to be manufactured into items such as clothing. These finished products would be sold to the world, including America. Seems kind of strange I never learned this in my High School American History class, unless, of course, the British Cabal control the narrative.

After the Revolutionary War, the Brits put manufactured products on the open market at less than the cost to produce them, with the sole purpose of destroying America’s economy. The newly-created American economy couldn’t afford to compete.

The British did something similar to the Germans following WWI: As a part of Germany’s surrender, the Brits and French put in stipulations that wouldn’t allow the Germans to be able to rebuild their economy; the Germans couldn’t export their products. Much of the country lived in complete poverty, and remember, the Kaiser was King George’s first cousin, so just imagine how he and his country would have been treated if they were 3rd cousins, twice removed.

As I mentioned in my last feature, I believe the British Cabal created Communism, and I believe in the early 1990’s, they transitioned from controlling through the Soviet Union to controlling through the CCP.

In the 1990’s, China became a new economic superpower. This occurred through creating cheap goods and selling them on the open market at prices lower than other countries such as America could produce. This created a mass exodus of American manufacturing to China.

Doesn’t this sound eerily similar to what the Brits did to America immediately following the Revolutionary War?

By the way, after the attack on America’s economy, post-Revolutionary War, our early American leaders put tariffs on England. Anyone remember what Trump did to China?

I believe England created Communism, and that they use and still use it to control the world. They played the Soviet Union off the US, and now they play China off the US. They change enemies and alliances the way it’s portrayed in the novel 1984. They switch things up and rewrite history, ‘memory holing’ anything that occurred the week prior that goes against their preferred narrative.

I’ve mentioned, I believe the British Cabal created the Soviet Union. First, they used them as an ally, then an adversary. The Soviet Union has been used as a human shield, as well as a boogeyman. To a lesser extent, the US has also been thrown into the meat grinder to protect the British Cabal’s interests.

During WWII, having entered the war more than two years after England, France and The Soviet Union, the US had 417k military deaths. England had 383k. France, who was invaded, only had 217k. Again, this is even with the US entering the war 27 months later. The Soviet Union had 9 to 11 million military deaths. This means that, for every one British military death, there was 23-29 Soviet military deaths, and mind you, they were fighting on the same side.

To give one perspective, in Vietnam, 1,100,000 North Vietnamese soldiers died versus 58,300 American soldiers. This means that, even with vastly superior fire power, one American died for every 19 North Vietnamese soldiers. How is it possible that so many Soviet soldiers died, unless they were sent to the slaughterhouse to die, exemplifying the true meaning of the word, ‘expendable.’

Om de sluiter helemaal op te lichten ten slotte nog dit artikel van Sovereign Australian:

Three Corporations run the world: City of London, Washington DC and Vatican City.

World events most of which are ‘engineered’ leave a trail that leads to the architects. We next discover that there are 3 cities on earth that come under no national authority, they have separate laws, they pay no taxes, they have their own police force and even possess their own flag of ‘independence’. These 3 cities control the economy, military onslaughts and the spiritual beings of those in powers. The 3 cities are actually corporations and they are the City of London, District of Columbia and the Vatican. Together they control politicians, the courts, educational institutions, food supply, natural resources, foreign policies, economies, media, and the money flow of most nations as well as 80% of the world’s entire wealth. Their ultimate aim is to build a totalitarian rule on a global scale where people will be divided into rulers and the ruled after they have depopulated the world to numbers they wish to rule over. What we need to understand is that the world does not work according to what we have been led to believe. We are drowning in misinformation.

At the center of each city state are giant phallic shaped stone monuments called obelisks.