Nog een boek over het al dan niet bestaan van kernwapens. Het interessante van dit boek is dat het deze vraag koppelt aan een andere mogelijke hoax: het bestaan van UFO's en aliens. Virussen, kernwapens, aliens...is het allemaal bedoeld als psychologische oorlogsvoering om de bevolking onder de duim te houden en de nieuwe wereldorde tot stand te brengen?
- Wie zit er achter het UFO/alien psy-op? Wel onze vrienden de Rockefellers natuurlijk:
Possibly, but perhaps of an earthier, more everyday origin. O’Brien mentions he has a patron – Lawrence Rockefeller – also Steven Greer’s earlier sponsor. The fact that a researcher like Christopher O’Brien should be of interest to Establishment players, might suggest amongst other things that his phone was bugged and TPTB, possibly aware of his bent for mystical interpretations of phenomena, could be susceptible to this sort of fly over. This is just speculation on my part, but may be another case of a researcher possibly being played. O’Brien has dug up some very interesting data. For instance, he states that there were no mutilations to speak of in North America between 1999 and 2006, although there had been 3300 cases in South America since 2000. O’Brien states that an FBI briefing stated that more than 1500 cattle in twenty-two states of the USA were killed and mutilated between 1973 and 1976. O’Brien notes that there have been several whistle-blowers, including ex police chief Ted Oliphant who has said, Mutilations are government bioweapons experiments. - De Rockefellers gebruiken dus disinfo-agenten om de UFO-hoax te verspreiden:
If this isn’t persuasive enough of a fraud, we even have the testimony of John Wheyleigh aka John Waby, his real name, who claims he perpetuated the hoax. Human nature as it is, the believers countered by saying that he was just making his hoax claim up! Notwithstanding this particular hoax, many people have seen balls of light in the countryside, sometimes around crop circles and elsewhere in the countryside. It’s an interesting phenomenon that has historically been called Will O The Wisp, Jack O lanterns, and Ignus Fatuus – translated from Latin as Foolish Fire. Interestingly some Hoaxers or Circle Makers – depending on your point of view – have even claimed to have seen this phenomenon while about their nefarious activity – or engaged in their art. There is no reason to disbelieve many witnesses worldwide who have seen balls of light. It seems only balls of light in Wiltshire however, have sufficient breeding to construct such designs as the complex mathematical Julia Sets though… There is almost certainly a rational explanation for the balls of light, but unfortunately for those of us who have observed the disinformationalists attributing flying saucers to swamp gas, the proffered explanation by sceptics could now be hard to swallow. The balls of light could strangely enough, actually be ignited marsh gas! The believers however, had a new champion: Burke, Levengood and Talbot (BLT). This was a team of alleged scientists sponsored by Lawrence Rockefeller, a patron also of Chris O’Brien and Steven Greer. This oil dynasty member has been portrayed as a jovial philanthropist interested in ufology.
In the Project Beta, Greg Bishop has documented the terrible case of Paul Bennewitz. In brief: Bennewitz was a local UFO organiser who had observed what he regarded as anomalous aerial phenomena and electronic signalling around Kirtland AFB by where he lived. He alerted the authorities to his concerns. Rather than put their hands up and say to him as a military contractor himself, to just keep quiet about the occurrences, as they were of terrestrial origin, they used him as a conduit for disinformation that contributed significantly to a deteriorating state of mental health that ruined his life. The Robertson panel deliberations in the 1950s had promoted the case for monitoring UFO groups, and so it came to pass. For monitoring, read infiltration. An example was board member of NICAP Roscoe Hillenkoetter, also the first director of the CIA. The UFO community was crawling with these kinds of people. - De eerste atoombommen - Manhattan-project - wou men maken op basis van Uranium 235:
The original intention was to create bombs made from uranium 235 – written as 235U. Uranium is a metal that predominately exists in its uranium 238 state, 238U. The number is a designation of the element’s atomic mass. The difference of three in the lighter 235U isotope is owing to having three less neutrons in its nucleus. 235U however, is the isotope of interest, and the Oak Ridge facility was responsible for separating the isotopes for the production of this element. - De vader van de atoombom Robert Oppenheimer: zijn familie had links met de Rothchilds en hijzelf werd eerder beschouwd als een acteur ipv. wetenschapper:
The PBS documentary informs us that the cost of the Manhattan Project by the summer of 1945 was three hundred and fifty million dollars. Someone was certainly profiting from this. It should be noted that the Oppenheimer family had links with the Rothschilds going way back. It’s been said of Robert Oppenheimer that he wasn’t everyone’s choice to head the research, and commonly held that he couldn’t run a hotdog stand. He’s also described as something of an actor by Manhattan Project historian Richard Rhodes. If anything, I assert that this provides more evidence of how political spin has overtaken scientific objectivity. - Oak Ridge was wellicht bedoeld om van uranimum duurder uranium te maken:
I whole heartedly recommend the online film, Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist, by Edward Matthews to the reader: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jo7Ytg9ckC0 (verwijderd op YouTube maar wel te vinden op Rumble, TFB) In a brilliant exposition of the subject, he gives the opinion that the Oak Ridge facility was a means of turning uranium into expensive uranium. The official narrative tells us that the first bomb that was to be later dropped on Hiroshima was of the gun type. In simple terms, one lump of 235U would be fired down the barrel of one end of the bomb at high velocity and collide with another lump of 235U. - De bom over Hiroshima was waarschijnlijk fake:
The resulting mass would have supposedly reached a “critical state”, resulting in a chain reaction of released neutrons and energy; hence an atomic explosion. We are told there was a problem in that there wasn’t enough 235U available for a test explosion. There was only enough for one bomb. This bomb was called Little Boy. On the sixth August 1945 the Enola Gay dropped Little Boy over Hiroshima at 8.15am. At a height of 1900 feet, one lump of metal allegedly collided with another lump of metal. We are told this was the first time a nuclear explosion had occurred in anger. It wasn’t the first purported nuclear explosion however, because the Manhattan Project knowing there would not be enough 235U available for multiple bombs, in the meantime, had to come up with something else. - De Triniti-test waarschijnlijk ook (de fameuze paddestoelwolk die nu exclusief geassocieerd wordt met de atoombom kan ook het gevolg zijn van gewone explosieven - niets speciaals aan, en de rest kan opgesmukt worden via gepruts met de camera's):
The very first alleged atomic explosion occurred on the 16th July 1945 at the Trinity test site, Alamogordo, New Mexico. No one doubts there was a big explosion. I assert it was a conventional explosion, and further that subsequent films explosions ever since may have been seeded with elements giving distinctive chemical reactions, and hence colour, as well as possibly being seeded with radioactive material. In the next chapter the subject of radioactivity itself will be examined, as it is not so clear that certain substances are as deadly in the ways that are commonly supposed. In any case Edmund Matthews film shows how controlled conventional explosion are not disputed by TPTB. Indeed, we can see this, and he argues that it is possibly two groups were tasked with setting up a control explosion, with each being told it is the other setting up the real bomb. Official film shows conventional explosive being set up as a control. This isn’t disputed. Why haven’t we though seen a conventional explosive control from this era taking place, and had it pointed out to us as such, side by side with the alleged nuke? The photographic and film of subsequent purported nuclear explosions has come under scrutiny by researchers. They note many things. A conventional explosion can produce a mushroom cloud. Somehow the public have been conditioned to associate mushroom clouds with only nuclear explosions. Mushroom clouds are produced by conventional explosions! - Waarom zou Japen meegaan in het verhaal (omdat het hen goed uitkwam - zo konden ze overgeven en uit de klauwen van het Rode Leger blijven)?
The Rushmore Denooyer PBS documentary for its own part expresses a self-congratulatory message that Americans felt about the scientific achievement of the new nuclear weapon. American ingenuity was the reason for the sudden end of the war. The detonation or non-detonation of atom bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki suited both the American and Japanese policy makers. They shared a common desire for Japan not to be occupied by the Red Army. - De rol die Einstein heeft gespeeld is op zijn minste dubieus te noemen:
Christopher Jon Bjernes has no problem in pointing the finger squarely at Zionist Jewish influence in the world of science. If we hadn’t guessed it already, we see that the seminal disheveled scientist that has spawned many imitators is Albert Einstein. Bjernes has written several books relating to Zionism and Einstein: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1TUqw96iVw We learn that Einstein came to America in 1921 primarily to promote Zionism! At the beginning of the twentieth century powerful forces headed by the Rothschilds were seeking to promote Palestine as a homeland for the Jewish diaspora. The newspapers under Jewish control were promoting Einstein beyond his ability. The pretext for his real elevation to celebrity genius were astronomical observations, possibly verifying aspects of his General Relativity theory. In 1921 he was awarded the Nobel prize in physics for services to theoretical physics and the photoelectric effect, but couldn’t be there to receive it.
Bjerknes points out in his work how Einstein is groomed as a Jewish Genius with one eye on the good publicity that that would bring for the Zionist cause; viz. the creation of a Jewish state. Let us recall the Balfour declaration made in 1917 not long before, to make Palestine a British protectorate after the first world war, enabled the first stage of the creation of Israel.
The price of American entrance into WWI was Britain’s acquiescence to this request. To this day the current prime minster Theresa May lauds the Balfour declaration as honourable, when in fact it was an act of grovelling that has resulted in the continuing extermination of the indigenous Palestinians.
In Britain eighty percent of Conservative members of parliament are listed as Friends of Israel. We’ve been subject to continuing destabilised world amplified by the 2001 September 11th attacks which were unquestionably sanctioned by Zionist forces looking to expand their military influence; vis-à-vis their pulling of the strings of the corrupt American political system. I don’t subscribe to the Christian narrative as such, but I can’t find any other adjective accept satanic to describe how it as all played out. If anything, I would emphasis Zionist, as opposed to Jewish, influence within the political, banking, and media spheres. It’s no wonder though that Jewish and Zionist are often regarded as interchangeable terms, considering the disproportionate influence of people of Jewish ethnicity.
Special Relativity has also become associated with the most famous physics equation in the world, E=mc2. This links energy, E with mass, m, and the speed of light, c. What is being stated is that mass and energy have an equivalence.
This equation has mistakenly been attributed to energy released from an atomic bomb. Even “experts” subscribing to the official narrative of nukes being real have claimed E=mc2 does not describe the amount of energy released!
It turns out that Einstein too was not so mathematically gifted as one would think a theoretical physicist might have expected to have been, with the charge of plagiarism also being laid at his door. This has never been debated in the mainstream arena so much, and reference to it has always given rise to the one size fits all anti-Semitic rejoinder that sadly deflects much needed discussion. Truth is in a strait jacket but will get out one day, I’m sure of that. The famous E=mc2 never actually appears explicitly in the 1905 paper. Physicist Herbert Ives, as Christopher Bjerknes points out, relates how Einstein hadn’t credited Henri Poincare with the contribution he had made. One doesn’t have to be a physicist to wonder why the equations used in the 1905 paper are called the Lorentz transformations, named after Hendrik Lorentz either; they aren’t called the Einstein transformations after all are they? Ives also tells us that Einstein used circular reasoning in his presentation, setting out with what he hoped to prove.
Further, there is good reason to believe that Mrs Einstein, Mileva Einstein-Marity, was the mathematical brains in the marriage. According to Bjerknes, the early papers had the signatures Einstein-Marity on them. Mileva had been educated at Heidelberg university. Along with this, unusual for the time access of higher education to a female, there was also a reluctance to accept women’s achievements. In fact, talented women would often use a male pseudonym, or perhaps defer to their husbands, allowing him to take credit for the overall economic good of the family. Bjerknes tell us that Einstein-Marity hoped Albert Einstein would become famous based on their work. According to one of their sons, Mileva coached Albert on mathematics. - Noch Oppenheimer (die hem niet uitnodigde om deel te nemen aan het Manhatten-project, terwijl dat toch de logica zelf leek), noch Tesla hadden een hoge dunk van Einstein:
Robert Oppenheimer regarded him as a lesser scientist, and didn’t invite him to join the Manhattan Project. We may recall the Einstein signed letter written to Roosevelt. Nikola Tesla thought little of Einstein because of the latter’s rejection of the ether concept. I think many alternative modern physicists only semantically reject the ether. They just call it something else. Just my opinion. A rose by any other name would smell as sweet, as they say. The question of free energy being readily available given the necessary political will, will also be addressed later, and touches upon UFO propulsion as well as the issue of safely generated electricity by conventional nuclear fission. - Wetenschappers gebruikten hun eigen vergelijkingen die niets te maken hadden met E = MC²:
Serber uses his own equation to derive the specifics of that electrostatic energy. In a simple case of electrons pushed together it appears as: E = e2 / R where: e is the electron charge, e2 is e multiplied by itself, and R is the distance between the particles. The electrostatic energy thus ends up as kinetic energy, the energy of motion. This equation could apply to either electrons pushed together (a relatively weak encounter) or, more interestingly for explosive fission, it can be extended to apply to the bound protons of a material like the 235 isotope of (enriched) uranium.” So in other words the famous mass energy equivalence formula E=mc2 doesn’t even describe the purported nuclear explosion mechanism, even from the perspective of nuclear bomb aficionados! It’s E = e2 / R! - Maar wat dan met kernenergie? Er is echter een groot verschil tussen de twee. En de zon? Maar die "explosies" zijn het gevolg van kernfusie, niet kernsplitsing zoals met de atoombommen:
It’s the splitting of an atomic nucleus, known as fission that releases energy that produces heat that produces steam that drives turbines that generates electricity. The nuclear bomb sceptic can be faced with something of a strawman argument when debating this subject. Let me be clear: I do not doubt the existence of slowly released nuclear energy. As a nuclear bomb sceptic however, I do doubt the existence of nuclear explosions! This also has ramifications for how the sun and other star produce energy. Our bar room intellectual will opine how the sun is powered by nuclear explosions. Rather than fission, the sun is said to be powered by fusion within the current astronomical paradigm. Fusion is the joining together of atomic nuclei with the creation of new elements and the release of energy. This to remind ourselves, is the purported mechanism of the Hydrogen bomb which relies on an initial Little Boy fission type reaction to cause a bigger fusion chain reaction. Millions have been spent on Hot Nuclear Fusion research without results. Conversely viable Cold Fusion research has been decried. - De atoomkern is minuscuul in vergelijking met de atoom zelf, net zoals een virus gigantisch klein is in vergelijking met de lichaamscel, waarvan ze gebruik zou maken om zichzelf te vermenigvuldigen. Een neutron moet voor een explosie een andere neutron raken en die kans is gewoon veel te klein (met virussen maakt men eens de vergelijking van een bal tot een stadion, met neutronen en schieten op een vlieg in een muziekhal - je ziet meteen weer dat "wetenschap" steeds dezelfde zeer onwaarschijnlijke aannames doet, en dan moeten wij erin "geloven" omdat er een "consensus" zou zijn):
The Elites find willing accomplices in the universities, where funding determines the direction of research. Go against the grain and you will be defunded! Akio Nakatani in his book Death Object - Exploding The Nuclear Weapons Hoax, marshals together many first-hand witnesses to the alleged nuclear tests and explosions. In his exposition he also points out the difficulties one might have in obtaining a series of fast nuclear chain reactions. The simplified version of a nuclear explosion is of an element in its desired isotopic form, 235U or 239Pu attaining critical mass by gun mechanism or implosion, enabling a cascade of neutrons hitting other neutrons in a massive catastrophic chain reaction, and finally – bang – all within a fraction of a second. Nakatani draws our attention to the size of the atomic nucleus compared to the size of the atom itself. One observer noted that for a single neutron to hit another it would be like shooting a mosquito in a music hall. There is little doubt that, within the understanding of the current model at least, neutrons do propagate the more sedate fissions that power turbines, but the notion that an explosive reaction can take place is a leap of faith. - Kritiek op het officiële verhaal:
Nakatani skilfully dissects the Manhattan narrative. He notes that Little Boy, the 235U bomb dropped on Hiroshima worked first time – apparently – without being tested. The shortage of the necessary enriched 235U from 238U was such that tests weren’t possible. By the same token the prototype of Fat Man, dropped on Nagasaki based on 239Pu, had sufficient plutonium to enable testing, and this was purportedly done on the 16th July 1945 at Alamogordo, Mew Mexico. The official story goes that plutonium produced in an atomic reactor from uranium 238 was preferred to uranium 235, which was more difficult to produce. The narrative further states that because of the impurity of the reactor produced 239Pu – it contained the isotope 240Pu – the gun type device projected for this Thin Man designated device, wouldn’t work.
Nakatani persuasively argues that given the expertise shown in separating the very sparse 235U from the more common 238U at Oak Ridge, surely TPTB could use their ingenuity to separate 240Pu from 239Pu? After all the gun device, according to the official narrative was guaranteed to work, and the fiddling around with the much more complicated plutonium based Fat Man, with its implosion technology, including symmetrical engineering, was incredibly tricky. - Verschillende bronnen - waarom Oppenheimer zelf - geven aanleiding om aan het bestaan van kernbommen te twijfelen:
By the same token I expect Kennedy was sincere when saying, Before the decade was out, of landing a man on the moon. Germany certainly pushed the engineering envelope towards the end of the war. In May 1945 when Robert Oppenheimer was disenchanted with it all, and has been quoted as saying, The Atomic bomb is shit, something like 350 million dollars had been spent on the Manhattan Project. Someone was benefiting from all the expenditure, weren’t they? This quote attributed to Morton Camac (Los Alamos) provided by John Coster-Mullen from his book Atom Bombs, is I think particularly insightful: After the war was over, Admiral Nimitz visited our laboratory. We described what we did and that the explosion was equal to 20,000 tons of dynamite. He said “You might believe it, but I don’t” and he walked out. - Het werk van Galon Winson geeft redenen om te twijfelen aan de nefaste gevolgen van "straling":
I have found the work of Galen Winsor fascinating. There are various videos of the lecture tour he embarked upon in the early to mid-eighties. The reader might like to put Galen Winsor: The Nuclear Scare Scam into their search engine. Here’s one link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMqHTbXm3rs Winsor had been given no reason to be sceptical of the atom bomb itself, but first-hand handling gave him cause to be sceptical of the supposed dangers of nuclear materials, and he told a very compelling story. Galen Winsor had a very impressive curriculum vitae: He was involved for over thirty five years with plutonium processing; worked at the Oak Ridge facilities; the Manhattan Hanford reactor; at General Electric facilities; worked at every major reactor decommissioning project up to 1982; he designed and built a reprocessing facility for General Electric; and his usual remit was in Analytic Process Inventory Control. Meaning, he was responsible for measuring and controlling the nuclear fuel inventory of these projects. I’m not aware of any serious attempt to debunk him and unsurprisingly Wikipedia, the Establishment’s bulldog hasn’t seen fit to mention him. Perhaps hoping if they ignore him, he and his legacy will somehow go away. The general thrust of his argument is that the dangers of nuclear fuels have been grossly exaggerated. He gives an account of when he first handled nuclear materials. They didn’t wear lab coats and handled uranium and plutonium with their bare hands. On his lecture tour Winsor recalled how he protested against what he regarded as unnecessary and politically motivated decisions to safeguard people from nuclear products in his own unique way.
In the video we see Galen Winsor eating plutonium and demonstrating with a Geiger counter as it entered him!
He describes how at work he would drink a glass of radioactive water a day and swim in a pool used for cooling nuclear materials. He notes that no one objected as he was the one who oversaw security and safety!
Eventually TPTB caught up with him and gave him what he referred to as the thou shalt not treatment. Winsor died at the age of 82 – not a bad innings. He believed nuclear reactors should be localised and provide much cheaper electricity, but that unfortunately we are up against the utility cartels. This parallels the prohibition of the possible energy devices used to propel antigravity craft in my opinion, and therefore is one good reason for their continuing secrecy. More on this later. He dismissed the 1982 High Level Waste Disposal Act and had a low opinion of members of congress who sanctioned it; no doubt in turn influenced by the Shadow Government themselves observing their own pecuniary benefits. This extra unnecessary safety concern causes extra expense in disposal itself but then Winsor repeatedly said:
He tells how he offered to take all the plutonium waste off General Electric for nothing and process it. He was told to go to hell and that they General Electric were themselves playing the plutonium futures game. Winsor was emphatic that the Three Mile Island incident was a hoax and was just following Hollywood’s China Syndrome script predicted a year earlier. He’d visited the Three Mile Island reactor in 1981 and said the accident was not only done on purpose, but also exaggerated in terms of its consequences. The interested reader might also like to examine the Chernobyl and Fukshima incidents with the same sceptical eye. We touch upon these incidents again later. Winsor stated: A nuclear reactor plant is the cleanest safest way to boil water. And Reusable uranium fuel which has been isotopically enhanced in power producing reactors is a valuable national resource not a high-level waste. We do learn that people have died from nuclear accidents; accidents involving criticality. Up to his time of speaking we are told eight people. Apparently, a blue radioactive flash occurs when larger amounts are slammed clumsily together. In the sense that criticality has a significance it can kill people but not in the hundreds of thousands. One wonders whether witnessing the blue flash the putative atom bomb pioneers had this empirical observation in mind when researching explosive criticality?
Aside from what Winsor described as criticality, the real benchmark of what constitutes dangerous radioactivity, according to him, was whether it burns or not. After all, we are bombarded with radiation all the time from the sun, and the subset of radiation known as radioactivity has been harmlessly passing through human beings forever from natural sources. We all know about sunburn and what happens if we spend too much time under the sun when its high in the sky, as opposed to being closer to the horizon. This is exactly the point Winser made with nuclear radiation. Intensity is the killer not length of exposure per se.
It’s fascinating subject. It is this author’s opinion that dangers of radioactivity while naturally of concern, have been, and are, greatly exaggerated in order to serve a political agenda. Interestingly, Galen Winsor cited radioactive materials as possible food preservatives. While researching this I also came across Radiation Hormesis – a possible alternative healing therapy using radiation. We are being kept in the dark about so very much… - Het is toch bizar dat nucleaire wapens NOOIT meer zijn gebruikt door boze mensen of door terroristen?
For those believing in the existence of nuclear weapons, it must seem amazing that since World War II they’ve never been used in anger and miraculously evaded the clutches of terrorist groups. Although one might well argue that countries like USA and Israel are terrorists in respect of the actions they carry out against technologically less advanced nations. Israel however, did not use nukes against Egypt or Syria during the six-day war. The USA did not drop H bombs on the North Vietnamese, presumably preferring more humanitarian weapons like agent orange, napalm, and white phosphorous bombs… In recent time the USA has dropped the so-called MOAB bomb – Massive Ordinance Air Blast – a conventional bomb in Afghanistan. Many people witnessing this bomb have mistaken it for a nuclear bomb. - En dat zoiets om humanitaire redenen zou zijn is natuurlijk en lachertje. Er zijn duizenden wapens: waarom hebben terroristen er nooit één op de kop kunnen tikken? En waarom is de nucleaire club nog altijd zo klein voor een technologie die al meer dan 70 jaar oud is...
Nuclear weapon believers would say that the USA has been constrained by its signature on various treaties. Don’t make me laugh. Tell that to the millions murdered by the American military in Iraq and elsewhere. Out of the supposed stock pile of thousands of nukes, common or garden, terrorists have never obtained one. The Nuclear Club is still small. The technology for Little Boy and Fat Man is over seventy years old. Why doesn’t every First world, or even Second world country, have nukes by now? It’s all BS… - En er zijn letterlijk tientallen accidenten met "kernwapens" in alle maten en gewichten....waarom heeft geen enkel ongeluk tot een explosie geleid?
In researching the nuclear bomb question, I was amazed by the number of accidents there were amongst aeroplanes carrying these supposed weapons. In Atomic Accidents, James Mahaffey notes: Did the Air Force ever lose an A-bomb, or did they just misplace a few of them for a short time? Did they ever drop anything that could be picked up by someone else and used against us? Is humanity going to perish because of poisonous plutonium spread that was snapped up by the wrong people after being somehow misplaced? Several examples will follow. You be the judge. Chuck Hansen was wrong about one thing. He counted thirty-two ‘Broke Arrow’ accidents. There are now sixty-five documented incidents in which nuclear weapons owned by the United States were lost, destroyed, or damaged between 1945 and 1989. These bombs and warheads, which contain hundreds of pounds of high explosive, have been abused in a wide range of unfortunate events. They have been accidentally dropped from high altitude, dropped from low altitude, crashed through the bomb bay doors while standing on the runway, tumbled off a fork lift, escaped from a chain hoist, and rolled off an aircraft carrier into the ocean. Bombs have been abandoned at the bottom of a test shaft, left buried in a crater, and lost in the mud off the coast of Georgia. Nuclear devices have been pounded with artillery of a foreign nature, struck by lightning, smashed to pieces, scorched, toasted, and burned beyond recognition. Incredibly, in all this mayhem, not a single nuclear weapon has gone off accidentally, anywhere in the world. If it had, the public would know about it. That type of accident would be almost impossible to conceal. Mahaffey is a mainstream chronicler. He has worked for the Defense Nuclear Agency, the National Ground Intelligence Center, and the Air Force Logistics Center. He manages to explain away the reason for why nuclear explosions didn’t result and the reader is free to consult his work. Within in his remit he has delivered a very handsome representation of the mainstream paradigm, with no doubt all the resources a company man has at his disposal. All these accidents though, do make you think. - Waarom verleent de Groene beweging met hun overdrijvingen rond radioactiviteit diensten aan het Establishment? Zijn ze dan toch niet zo anti-globalistisch als ze zich voordoen?
Not only the terror of nuclear war, but the green movement has largely over exaggerated the dangers of radioactivity. It should be added this latter fear is also serving the Establishment’s agendas. The touchy feely irrational spirit of liberalism has frequently been co-opted by the forces it ostensibly fights, against real truthful Anti Globalist initiatives… - Over de Internationale Campagne voor het afschaffen van kernwapens (ICAN):
Under the ABOUT ICAN tab we can view partner organizations. I suggest an in-depth exploration of these organisations and examination of their revenue streams will no doubt turn up some interesting contradictions. I wouldn’t be surprised to see government money funding them as well as their own supposed militaries. A contradiction explained by knowing that they are both creating the same false narrative. Follow the money is the injunction to the researcher, here and elsewhere. I note that ICAN received the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo on December 10th 2017. More proof of the complete BS value of the Nobel Prize. One of the partner organisations of ICAN is Greenpeace. You know, the “grassroots movement” with a 32-million-dollar ship… One of the founders of the originally well-intentioned group was Patrick Moore – not to be confused with the British celebrity astronomer of the same name. Moore describes his experiences in Confessions of A Greenpeace Dropout: The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist. Moore was a frontline activist, opposing nuclear testing, the clubbing of seals, and was very much a Save the Whale style activist. - Sponsor van Greenpeace: ja hoor, de Rockefellers!
The Infowars.com website dug up the following figure for donations from the Rockefellers to Greenpeace: Rockefeller Brothers Foundation Greenpeace $1,080,000.00 1997 – 2005 Rockefeller Family Fund Greenpeace $115,000.00 2002 – 2005 Rockefeller Foundation Greenpeace $20,285.00 1996 – 2001 Why would the creators of Standard Oil support an organisation that opposed hydro and nuclear power? - Terug naar de link UFO's-kernwapens:
Hastings has produced a fine work in UFOs & Nukes. The 2017 second edition is a big thick five-hundred-page tome. It’s well written and covers the nuke and UFO connection. To accompany the book there is a video UFOs and Nukes: The Secret Link Revealed. Hastings shows beyond reasonable doubt that UFOs, including saucers, spheres, cylinders, triangles, and small drone like foo fighters have visited the following from the late forties up until recent times: Nuclear test sites, plutonium enrichment sites, nuclear weapons storage areas, and missile silos.
Incidentally, in 2001 the National Press Club venue was used by Steve Greer’s Disclosure Project. Greer, as many have noted, is something of a cult leader, and seems to not get along with other circuit ufologists. His project was sponsored by Laurence Rockefeller, whom Greer promoted as a white hat. It should be noted this Rockefeller has also promoted the alien interpretation of crop circles by sponsoring certain alleged scientists. Laurence Rockefeller has also been a Bilderberger host. - Was de Cuban Missile Crisis een false flag of psy-opp?
A developing theme of this book is that the overarching authorities, the Banker Elites oversee the political apparatus of all the developed countries, including the old Soviet Union and new Russia, and as such, act as kingmakers or president removers when their puppets depart from the official playbook. I believe The Cuban Missile Crisis, which we will discuss later, was one of many artificial situations that seem almost random to observers during the Cold War, unless of course, viewed with a new set of optics. Remember though, in the world of politics and human affairs, things seldom happen by accident. This theatrical performance contained a few actors with whom we will be familiar: The USA, The Soviet Union, UFOs surprisingly or not, and nukes of course. There were cigars in the skies, but I think they were American rather than Cuban. - De bankiers zitten er natuurlijk ook voor iets tussen:
Now Bernard Baruch is an interesting character. Writers like G Edward Griffin have commented on Baruch’s ties with the bankers, the Versailles treaty, the CFR, and other elements of what we might call the Shadow Government; the architects of the New World Order comprising such agencies as the United Nations. On one level the publicly laudable idea of peaceful cooperation with the Soviet Union is promoted, giving the UN a moral mandate. On the other hand though, TPTB have fabricated a phony Cold War – good for bankers and arms manufacturers, but not so good for the victims of such wars – both military and civilian – as in Vietnam and Korea for example. - En ook de onderdrukking van thorium spreekt boekdelen. Waarom hebben de elites zo weinig zin in kernenergie? (JFK was een groot voorstander):
Along with the exaggerated claims for the dangers of nuclear fuel, there is also the suppression of the thorium nuclear reactor – a suppression aided by the AEC. This is a very interesting subject, and will be examined later. Over its history the AEC had different chairmen. They were a mixed bagged. Again, the degree to which any of these were in the information loop is an open question. Future researchers may wish to look deeper into these individuals as well as those they worked with. Here are the different chairmen with some brief notes on the different chairmen culled from Wikipedia in italics. I intersperse my own comments within theirs:
It should be noted of Strauss’s connection to the Rockefellers and Rothschilds. The latter via the Kuhn Loeb connection. It is now common knowledge that Kuhn Loeb bankrolled the Russian revolutionary Bolshevik Leon Trotsky.
1958 – 1960: John McCone – In 1958, he became chairman of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. According to journalist Seymour Hersh, in December 1960, while still Atomic Energy Commission chairman, McCone revealed CIA information about Israel's Dimona nuclear weapons plant to The New York Times. Hersh writes that President John F. Kennedy was "fixated" on the Israeli nuclear weapons program and one of the reasons that contributed to McCone's appointment as CIA director was his willingness to deal with this and other nuclear weapons issues – and despite the fact that McCone was a conservative Republican… Much could be said of Israel and nukes, and particularly with respect to JFK. One author, Michael Collins Piper has implicated Israel in his assassination because of JFK’s opposition to them on this issue. I read his work, Final Judgement, some years ago. Long before I came to believe nukes were a hoax, I found Piper’s contention unconvincing. I could however agree with the contention of Israel generically being implicated in the assassination, based on more recent events such as 9/11, underlining where the power really lies. This along for example with the numerous congressmen with joint Israeli citizenship; how the USA is a puppet of the Rothschild created Jewish colony in Palestine; and how Zionists incontestably control the five or six largest American media organisations along with the world’s Central Banking System. Those of us wearing the white cowboy hats sure have a long uphill ride ahead of us. The ride being much harder for the good guys in the US where TPTB are orchestrating fake shooting events aimed at stripping Americans of their right to bear arms… If nukes were real, why didn’t the Israeli’s use them in the 1967 war? They certainly have one bargaining chip of fear; the so-called Samson Option. Recalling how the Old Testament hero brought down the temple on himself and his enemies, some have suggested Israel would blow up the world with their nukes if their own survival was at stake. It’s a great relief to me that they can’t do this, but no comfort in other ways knowing that Zionist policy seems to be the driving force behind the destruction of Europe with its George Soros – amongst others – inspired no borders policy. As others have said, Zionists in ethnically cleansing the Palestinians from their own land, seem to have no problem with the genocide of indigenous European peoples…
Whether Vanunu has been genuinely persecuted or not, the context of his publicised activity, feeds the lie in this author’s opinion, of the nuclear weapons hoax. Returning again to McCone: He did become CIA director. The previous director who Kennedy removed, Allen Dulles, was unquestionably involved in the assassination of JFK. The CIA had become a Frankenstein’s monster. Harry Truman later said:
Vannevar Bush had a very impressive resume: In 1916-1917 he was awarded D Eng. From both Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). He was appointed Assistant Professor of electrical engineering at Tufts College. In 1919 he was appointed Associate Professor of electrical power transmission at MIT. In 1923 he was appointed professor of electrical power transmission at MIT. I can’t help thinking he would have been at home in Southwest Poland during the second world war where die Glocke was being developed with all those high voltage cabling. There again, if something similar was being developed in the USA, I think Bush would almost certainly be involved with it too! In 1928 he developed an analogue computer The Differential Analyzer. In 1932 he was appointed Vice President of MIT and first Dean of The School of Engineering. In 1935 he patented the Differential Analyzer at MIT. In 1938 Dr Bush and John Howard propose, build, and patent the rapid selector; a machine for high-speed location of information stored on microfilm. Perhaps something that may be regarded as forerunner of the internet? In 1938 he was elected President of the Carnegie Institution of Washington DC. The Carnegie Institute being another one of those self-serving bodies that rich people set up to avoid tax and promote themselves as philanthropists. G Edward Griffin amongst others has critiqued these so-called Tax Exempt Organisations. I’m getting the above information from a YouTube symposium: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwwvMUzasU0&t=21s Apparently, he also developed the “Rockefeller” Differential Analyzer as well. Whenever I see or hear “Rockefeller” in our area of interest my ears prick up… In 1939-1941 he was chairman of the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. In 1940 he was appointed Chairman of the National Defense Research Committee (NDRC). During 1941-1947 he was director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD). We are told the previous two appointments make him a central figure in the development of nuclear fission and the Manhattan Project. He was also President Roosevelt’s science advisor. - Wist Robert McNamara dat kernwapens fake zijn?
In researching this topic, I wondered whether Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara may have been in the loop regarding the nuke hoax. The fact that he subsequently became President of the World Bank is one red flag for me. The documentary The Fog of War featuring McNamara answering questions about his experiences of the Cold War is interesting. I find it hard not to place the psychopathic McNamara within the inner circles who knew about the nuke fiction. McNamara is not shy in coming forward, and has featured in the aforementioned film, as well as several History Channel documentaries. - De Cuban Missile Crisis dan:
By October 22nd the President having rejecting more hawkish suggestion from General Curtis LeMay, Air Force Chief of Staff, goes on national media to announce a forthcoming blockade – or quarantine – of Cuba. This apparently was a suggestion from McNamara. American sailors ponder on the rather vague rules of engagement for this. In Cuba a quarter of a million people are mobilised in anticipation of a possible American invasion. On October 23rd sixty American ships move into position. Twenty Russian ships, one supposedly carrying nukes, reach the vicinity before the blockade is totally in place. American destroyers are told to only open fire only on orders of the Whitehouse. When I first came across that I was reminded of the Hollywood image of the dynamic executive image of an American President. Further, and by the same token, I find the notion of the President, as one man with a finger on the “big red button”, also absurd. As well as in Independence Day, another image of this idealised democratically elected President with no power-behind-the-throne-overseers, appears in the Cold War thriller Fail Safe released in October 1964. Strangely enough the Fail Safe story had previously been serialised contemporaneously with the Cuban Missile Crisis itself as events were unfolding. I should also like to remind the reader of the 1938 Orson Welles adaption of The War of The Worlds that frightened the bejesus out of Americans. Some trace this to the Rockefeller sponsorship, citing it as a rather cynical way of researching crowd behaviour. In any case, the Cuban Missile Crisis did genuinely frighten the whole world – that is power! - Meer over de Rockefeller's:
An interesting thing is the Rockefellers aren’t nominally Jewish, but they certainly act like what Henry Ford called International Jews. Amazingly the Rockefellers supplied the Third Reich with oil during the war as well as equipping them with the means to make synthetic oil. As Henry Ford notes, the best way to understand the thoughts of Jews is through their own media as opposed to the media meant for the gentiles.
The conspirators behind the Federal Reserve creation were the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers. There were other names, but they were just fronts for the big two that Wizard of Oz author Frank Baum had characterised as the Wicked Witch of the East and the Wicked Witch of the West. Among the Rothschild cut outs was J P Morgan, the top hatted Monopoly board icon, whom on his death was found to own only a fraction of what he ostensibly owned. The Rothschilds were famous for hiring front men to take the heat off themselves, and especially using non-Jews. Nelson Aldrich another Fed conspirator married into the Rockefeller clan, lending his first name to future Vice President Nelson Rockefeller.
People have speculated that the Rockefellers themselves were originally Rothschild agents, suggesting their nominal religious affiliation as Baptists, masks their Sephardic Jewish origins. This remains an open question. I emphasise though that Zionism is a political philosophy – Islam is another by the way – that hides behind religion and race. One can be a Zionist without being Jewish. I also believe many Jewish people don’t realise that International Zionism use them as cover.
The Rothschilds broadened their interests from banking to oil, being an owner of Shell Oil, and the Rockefellers extended their empire from oil to banking, being associated with the Chase, later Chase Manhattan banks. The relationship between Rockefellers and Rothschilds is unclear to me, and I believe there has been deliberate obfuscations of ownerships. Different fronts are used, and then there is the business of interlocking directorates, which would take an army of lawyers and financiers to unravel and make sense of.
During the final months of the war, General George Patton commander of the Seventh army was pushing through Western Europe. At this time David Rockefeller grandson of patriarch J D Rockefeller was holding a cushy job working for military intelligence in France, while future CIA director and Wall Street lawyer Allen Dulles, was in Switzerland making sure that American-German business interests were being looked after. Meanwhile on the battlefield the men were bleeding, and women and children were being bombed at home. Rockefeller in his biography said, He had had a good war. In a state of naivety one may naturally assume that a country’s intelligence services work in that country’s interests, but this is not so. Servando Gonzalez, an insightful researcher and writer describes in Psychological Warfare and The New World Order (Kindle versie is verdwenen van Amazon, er is nog een paperback maar die is "Currently Unavailable, TFB), how the evolution of American’ intelligence and operations had its roots in Rockefeller’s Standard Oil dirty tricks department. - De Rockefellers saboteren Patton's vooruitgang, waardoor de Russen konden expanderen:
As Patton continued through Europe, he was advancing too quickly for TPTB. They went as far as deny him fuel for his vehicles to slow him down. In fact, he was so advanced into the Reich, he was ordered to pull back. Patton was furious with all of this. He protested vehemently, so much so that he would later announce his intentions of running for President. Old Blood and Guts, as he was known, was a soldier’s soldier, unlike General Eisenhower a future CFR talented spotted puppet. The allies failure to push on ceded the whole of Eastern Europe to Russian, and what would become an expanded Soviet Union. Gonzalez argues this was deliberate, and the early stages were thus being set for the coming Cold War. The resulting tensions and need for military expenditure including those phony nukes would provide very lucrative profits for banking and big business. - Patton werd vervolgens vermoord:
Patton’s good intentions were brought to a halt when he supposedly died from injuries in a vehicle collision. Researchers have concluded that Patton was probably murdered on the orders of Bill Donovan, head of the American Operation of Strategic Services (OSS) usually regarded as the forerunner of the CIA. Target Patton: The Plot to Assassinate General George S. Patton, by Robert Wilcox documents this. Significantly, we have a confession from the man who claims he was the field operative responsible. His name was Douglas Bazata, and he spoke in front of 450 invited guests at the Hilton Hotel in Washington DC on 25th September 1979. - Terug naar de UFO disinfo agenten en de Rockefellers:
Bearing in mind Greer’s patronage by Laurence Rockefeller, a kind old man according to the former, I began wondering whether there was any direct link from Bearden to Rockefeller and the oil industry. It turns out that the video producer for Energy From The Vacuum, Tom Craddock has had a long association with the oil industry and the revelations don’t stop there. http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/forum/thread9268.html One commenter summarises it thus: You know, honestly I have no clue. My gut tells me that something fishy is afoot though. Why would two international oil companies share the same corporate headquarters (a beachfront house no less) with Tom Bearden and Dr. Greer? I was sucked into the disclosure project a few months back, had to do all that catching up on it, and you know ... nothing ever came of it. Except Greer's SEAS Company, supposedly looking for the next great inventor who comes up with an "over unity" device. I think you’re right on the money about the ufos and disinformation, get the publics hope up, promise them free abundant energy, tie it to the fringe UFO field, then when it never comes you can blame it on those crazy conspiracy theorists. All I know is I never trusted Bearden to begin with, if you really had an over unity device, you would either be the most famously rich inventor in the world, or the most quiet one because the DOD bought up all the rights. Personally, everything I’ve ever come across about Bearden, Greer, disclosure and SEAS is all $#@#! now in my eyes. I’m hoping maybe others will do some snooping/critical thinking and maybe help figure out just what the hell is going on here. Just one more mention of the kind old man Laurence Rockefeller. As well as funding so called Crop Circle Science, Rockefeller is mentioned in Whitley Schreiber’s Hidden Agendas UFO Briefing Document where he is thanked in the book’s acknowledgements for his vision and support, financial and otherwise… - Rockefeller's: olieboeren of bankiers....
We do well to remember their previous schemings. When Standard Oil was forced to break up because of its monopoly status, the individual companies proved even more profitable for the dynasty than one single monolithic unit. Of course, the Rockefeller didn’t give their oil interests away they divested themselves of them. The Rockefeller’s it should be noted, have certainly not divested themselves of their banking interests… - En wat was het hele koude fusie verhaal allemaal voor?
Antony Sutton writing not long after the birth of Cold Fusion, reminds us that something like $20 billion dollars of government money had been spent on so called Hot Fusion research. As far as we know this has not been a very productive area of research in delivering value for money to the tax payer. But with these big government expenditure products alas, it is merely sufficient to please the banks and the corporations. In fact, one can see that a lot of public expenditure the world over is of little value to its citizens. This has been well documented in third world countries where World Bank/IMF programmes to industrialise, do not benefit local people, but do benefit the usual suspects.
One of those emerging from the gates of Mordor to oppose the birth of the Cold Fusion baby was John Maddox, editor of Nature; the periodical also now reinforcing the anthropogenic warmings bollocks amongst no doubt other pressitituted topics. Nature carried the headline Farewell (not fond) to Cold Fusion. For chutzpah it’s hard to beat John Huizenga’s assertion in, Cold Fusion The Scientific Fiasco Of The Twentieth Century, that Cold Fusion was Pathological Science. By pathological science, he implies it being unscientific. There is another sense in which pathological may be inferred though, and it may have escaped this individual’s moral compass. Huizenga worked on the enrichment of the uranium for Little Boy on the Manhattan Project. Since, he no doubt would not publicly agree that nukes a hoax, I can’t see anything more pathological than developing a purported weapon of mass destruction. Even in the sense that Huizenga uses the term pathological, there is the claim that Little Boy’s 235U payload detonated without any prior testing; it worked first time.
Both Thorium Liquid Salt Reactors and Cold Fusion, to name but two alternative means of producing energy, have seemingly received little governmental funding.
It’s almost as if someone in the oil industry wants it that way, isn’t it?
There is something else about these two methods of energy production; they bypass the need to create 239Pu, the putative necessary element in nuclear weapons, but also produced in fast breeder reactors for electricity generation. If you have a method of producing nuclear energy without these, the pretext of stopping countries of concern from deviating from the peaceful use of technology, becomes redundant. You are left with acknowledged harmless materials awaiting some other pretexts for the Establishment to ban them. - En wat dan is het verhaal met Iran?
Bearing in mind nukes are a hoax, I suspect the real issue with Iran is that their spearheading of nuclear technology has more to do with protecting the petrodollar than thinking that peaceful Iran a current bogeyman, high up on the PNAC hit list is going to start WWIII. Iran, if it hasn’t already, might wish to sidestep Washington’s morally weak and factually wrong onslaught against them by pursuing thorium or cold fusion research if they aren’t doing so already. Saudi Arabia is far more barbaric and an exporter of terrorism than Iran, yet the former is line with the petrodollar politics, while the latter seeks to challenge it. - Maar dat laatste is intussen ook aan het veranderen natuurlijk. En Noord-Korea?
The current situation in North Korea is amusing. The North Korean leadership must know that nukes are a fiction as do their American counterparts, who of course created the narrative in the first place. One would think, even accepting the idea that nukes are real, there might have been some significant debate on whether North Korea actually have these putative weapons of mass destruction. I have seen no mainstream discussion on this. I think the backstory here is that going to down avenue may risk upsetting the whole applecart of nuclear deception, and that just wouldn’t do from the Establishment perspective. - Nog iets over de Report from Iron Mountain ten slotte:
The Report written in 1967, proved quite prescient. If it is satire, then it is very informed satire, just as the British sitcom Yes Minister is genuine satire, yet it strikes a nerve because it does tell the truth about how democracy is just a facade for other forces to use in order for the Establishment to carry on unmolested by popular concerns. So, in this maelstrom of environmental and population agenda, we also must factor in hidden and exotic technologies that might support the Elite’s war against the world. The NWO certainly hasn’t refrained from using its saucers, triangles, and cylinders, against us on humanitarian grounds. They are keeping these up their sleeve for now. Perhaps they will be revealed as terrestrial when control is almost total and when we’re far closer to banker-controlled world government.
