Nu de JFK-files zijn "gedropt", lijkt het niet interessant om nog eens stil te staan bij een komplottheorie rond JFK. De thesis van dit boek is dat de moord op Kennedy eigenlijk een Britse staatsgreep was.

• Hamer preciseert dat het gaat over wat hij noemt "the crown". Wat bedoelt hij daarmee?
  ‘The Crown,’ is not subject to the UK Parliament in any way, shape or form. It is a totally independent and private entity, answering to no legally elected authority and is a Sovereign State within a State. The ‘City of London’ is the financial hub of the world and yet is a privately-owned organisation, with no public accountability whatsoever.
• Hij bedoelt dus eigenlijk de "city of London": het financieel knooppunt van de wereld. Hamer wordt nu concreet: 
  Now, as well as Rothschild, the ruling ‘Committee of 300’ of ‘The Crown’ includes the following multi-generational family names: Rockefeller Gore Greenspan Kissinger Krugman (NYTimes) Powell Gates Buffet Bush But, you may reasonably ask, why are these American families members of a ‘foreign’ committee? The answer is simply because the Crown STILL owns the private corporation known as the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! The Lord Mayor and his twelve-member council serve as proxies for the world’s thirteen wealthiest, most powerful banking families (syndicates) headed of course by our old friends, the Rothschild dynasty and these include names such as: Warburg Oppenheimer Schiff Rockefeller It is indeed, all the above families and their ancestors and descendants that have controlled and will control and run the Crown Corporation of the City of London, for many generations in most cases. But it is actually the Rockefeller ‘syndicate’ that runs The Crown’s American colony through interlocking directorships in JP Morgan Chase / Bank of America and Brown Brothers Harriman along with their ‘Big Oil’ oligarchy Exxon-Mobil (formerly the Rockefeller’s colossus, Standard Oil.) The Rockefellers also manage the Rothschild oil-asset, British Petroleum (BP) and the Crown Corporation holds title to world-wide Crown land in Crown colonies such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand and many Caribbean Islands.
• De V.S. is dus een private corporatie eigendom van "the crown" of beter gezegd: Rotschilds/Rockefeller. Amerika is dus nog steeds een kolonie van GB, en meer bepaald de City of London (en het Britse Koningshuis)
  King George III may ostensibly have rescinded his claims over the American colonies at the time of the alleged ‘independence’ in 1776, but he vehemently maintained his rights to continue receiving payment for his ‘business venture’ of colonising America.
• De V.S. heeft immers twee constituties, de originele echte werd vervangen door een andere in 1871:
  Unbeknown to many, there have been two Constitutions in the United States. The first one was illegally suspended in favour of a Vatican ‘Crown’ corporation in 1871. This in effect means that there has in effect been what amounts to a ‘Shadow Government,’ in place since 1871. The first Constitution was penned by the leaders of the newly independent states of the United States in 1776 and on the 4th July 1776, the people of the American colony, claimed their independence from the Crown. For ninety-five years the people of the US were free and independent but that all ended in 1871 when the original ‘Constitution for the United States for America’ was changed and replaced by the ‘THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.’ And so, since 1871, the US President and the United States Congress has been operating under an entirely different set of rules and policies. US citizens and indeed the rest of the world, are for the most part, blissfully unaware of the two distinctly different Constitutions of the United States.
• Canada, hoewel nominaal onafhankelijk, valt nog steeds onder de "crown". De Koning van GB is immers ook het staatshoofd van Canada. Is Canada bedoeld om die andere kolonie de V.S. onder controle te houden? Wil daarom Trump Canada overnemen? En kan dit verband hebben met het vrijgeven van de JFK-files?
  One of the ‘overseas distillers’ with strong links to Kennedy and that mainstream authors and historians tend to gloss-over, was the Jewish Bronfman family of bootleggers and brothel owners, who had made a fortune in Canada in the Prohibition era. The Bronfmans were major players in establishing the central, Bank of Canada (via the 1934 Bank of Canada Act,) as the sole issuer of banknotes in the country and the central bank for the Canadian dollar, and this was a ploy consolidated by the Rothschild central-banking cartel who arranged for the Bank of Canada to be designated a ‘Crown’ corporation, during the tenure of Canada’s complicit Prime Minister, Mackenzie King.
• En zo komen we terecht bij Joseph Kennedy:
  By 1933 the US had taken the first tentative steps towards repealing Prohibition, and with his usual foresight, Joe could see it was only a matter of time before the 18th Amendment was repealed and alcohol flowed freely again. So, he used his connections in Washington to obtain permits to import ridiculously large quantities of whisky for ‘medicinal purposes’ and stockpiled it in warehouses so that when Prohibition ended, he would have millions of dollars’ worth of high-quality liquor in stock, all ready to make yet another fortune for himself. After making his illicit fortune in alcohol, Kennedy was one of the first ‘Eastern establishment’ businessmen to grasp the potential of the movie business which was now firmly established on the west coast, primarily in Hollywood and by the mid-1920s, the American film industry was turning out 800 films a year and employed as many people as the car industry. This was indeed a ‘gold mine,’ as Joe had already told several friends.
  Hearst not only provided a huge campaign contribution, but he also steered his delegates towards Roosevelt. Kennedy justifiably claimed later that he had personally won the nomination for Roosevelt himself. However, more than a year after Roosevelt was elected President, Kennedy was still without his promised Cabinet post.
  The SEC, under Kennedy’s stewardship outlawed most of the practices that had made Kennedy his fortune, including a ban on short-selling, one of his preferred ways of making money. For almost two years, an almost constant stream of Wall Street stalwarts took to the witness stand and described their roles in their seamy dealings and even though Kennedy’s extensive, unethical (now illegal) transactions were revealed during the hearings, he was unsurprisingly never requested to appear, himself.
  By 1937, Kennedy had begun hinting to Roosevelt that he still ‘deserved’ some tangible form of recognition for his role in the election and so Roosevelt, who had by then become mistrustful of Kennedy, appointed him Ambassador to England. His Ambassadorship coincided almost exactly with the beginning of the ‘Crown’ engineered World War II in Europe and throughout his three-years in office, he vehemently argued against American and British involvement in the war. Joe steadfastly maintained his position of ‘appeasement’ towards Germany but in May 1940, Winston Churchill was elected British Prime Minister and this brought an end to appeasement (at the Zio-globalist bankers behest) and hastened Kennedy’s fall from grace. The ‘final nail in his coffin’ was Kennedy’s public statement to the effect that ‘Democracy is finished in England,’ thereby giving Roosevelt no choice but to ask for his resignation.
• Kennedy, als ambassadeur in London, was dus een hinderpaal voor Amerikaanse deelname aan WO2 (gewenst door de globalisten/zionisten/bankiers) en werd dus uiteindelijk door Roosevelt ontslagen al had Joseph Kennedy een belangrijke rol gespeeld bij de verkiezing van FDR tot president en al had hij zelf banden met die globalisten/zionisten/bankiers. Eén zo'n "crown"-dienaar was Aristotle Onassis, die de patriarch wou gebruiken om JFK verkozen te krijgen:
  In 1957, Joseph Kennedy took John and his wife Jackie to see Aristotle Onassis, a high-ranking ‘Crown’ acolyte, on his yacht, ostensibly in order to introduce Jack, but more importantly to remind Onassis of an old Mafia promise from his bootlegging days ... ‘The Presidency for a Kennedy.’ The all-powerful Onassis approved of what he saw in Jack and agreed. The Mafia, the underworld, the intelligence services and the military, the politicians, and corporations – have always served their Zio-globalist banking masters aka ‘The Crown,’ very well and by 1958, hordes of Mafia-selected, purchased and supported ‘grass-roots’ candidates had been placed into office. In 1960, the stirring election battle between Kennedy and Nixon was ‘fought,’ but either way, Onassis (the Crown) would win, since they had complete control over both candidates. In fact the 1960 campaign for the White House was the first ‘modern’ Presidential election, with the first televised debate and just as with staged TV wrestling bouts, they both knew what the outcome would be. Kennedy was promoted as the young, energetic and confident candidate, whilst Nixon was made to look uncomfortable, shifty and devious.
• De verkiezingscampagne van 1960 - de eerste moderne campagne in de wereld - had alle kenmerken van latere campagnes: beide kandidaten waren immers onder controle van dezelfde groep. JFK presidentschap begon natuurlijk niet al te best:
  The invasion of Cuba, later to become the Bay of Pigs’ ‘Operation Zapata,’ originated from the time when Eisenhower had approved an initial budget of $4.4m. The budget included $950,000 for political action, $1,700,000 for propaganda, $1,500,000 for paramilitary support and $250,000 for intelligence collection. The actual invasion, a year later, would cost US taxpayers over $46 million.
• Maar gelukkig was er nog de ruimtevaart, beginnende met Gagarin. Dat verhaal zit echter met haken en ogen aan mekaar:
  But did Gagarin really travel into space? Kennedy warmly congratulated Khrushchev for their achievement, but the fact that Kennedy did not contest this exploit was seen by the Russian people and the whole of the rest of the world, as the confirmation that Gagarin’s exploit was cold, hard fact. Yet, some days later, articles appeared in several American newspapers which were describing his so-called space-flight as a hoax, and explaining why it was not credible. Some politicians, for example a representative from Illinois, Roman Pucinski, urged Kennedy not to accept Gagarin’s ‘achievement’ without proof from the Russians (which they never provided – even to this day.)
  During the flight, Gagarin was systematically announcing his progress on the flight too early, which strongly suggests that his voice was a recording that had been started too early, which neatly explains the de-synchronisation between his voice and the corresponding events. Gagarin said that he was flying over South-America only fifteen minutes after he departed, when he needed in fact at least forty-five to get there. He also stated that he could distinctly see the Russian farms and meadows when he was at an altitude of two hundred miles, at which altitude this was impossible. Gagarin said he could see the earth ‘through his porthole’ when the chief of the Russian programme had said in a meeting that his cabin had no portholes, only tiny slits.
  In addition, Gagarin seemed to have a very poor memory about the events. For example, he wrote in his memoirs that he was wearing a blue suit during his exploit ... whereas the Russian authorities said he had an orange suit and he is clearly pictured in this orange suit in the aforementioned ‘official’ photo. Up until 1961, the United States had managed to launch 42 satellites, the Soviet Union only 12 and the US had also informed the world that Alan Shepard would be the ‘first man in space’ on 5th May 1961. Was the Soviet Union therefore forced to do something to ‘save face?’ It may have been for this reason that a Soviet cosmonaut, Vladimir Ilyushin, was launched into space on 7th April 1961. The Americans intercepted several radio communications between him and the space centre in the Soviet Union and Ilyushin crash-landed and was seriously injured. He could not therefore be shown to the public and it was claimed that he had been injured in a car accident. He was sent to China to receive medical treatment.
  Well here is a possible clue ... Some weeks later, after the Gagarin pseudo-flight, Kennedy made a major speech announcing that the Americans would put a man on the moon before the end of the decade. Before the end of the decade? Impossible now they say, let alone more than fifty years ago, so how could he be so certain when the difficulties were so great, and the technology still so relatively primitive? Yet, Kennedy warmly congratulated Khrushchev on Gagarin’s feat, which allowed the USSR to make huge political capital of it. It is certain that Kennedy was warned the same day by NASA that Gagarin’s exploit was a fraud and could easily be proven a fake so, what inspired Kennedy to boost the Russians by accepting what he knew to be a hoax, and why did it modify his attitude in the invasion of the Bay of Pigs?
  It now appears very clear that Gagarin’s fake space trip pushed Kennedy to deliberately sabotage the invasion by planning for it to fail. If Kennedy had allowed it to succeed, it would have diminished the value of the ‘gift’ that he had made to the Russians in turning a blind eye to their hoax. So, from this it is possible to conclude that Kennedy was expecting an important favour in return from the Russians, as immediately before the hoax, Kennedy showed no signs that he would allow the Cuban invasion to fail.
  But was allowing the Russians to claim ‘the first man in space,’ enough to counter-balance the prestige of landing the ‘first man on the moon?’ Kennedy reasoned that it may well not be sufficient and that he would no doubt have to grant the Russians some other favours to definitively ‘seal the deal’ about the future Apollo project. So, the refusal to support the invasion of the Bay of Pigs was the first of these other favours.
• Kennedy wou dus dat de invasie van Cuba zou mislukken om de Russen een dienst te bewijzen.
  Kennedy also had to ensure the silence of ‘insiders.’ Had he appointed an honest, patriotic American engineer, he would probably not have accepted the subterfuge and may have exposed it. And so, this was why Kennedy appointed as director of the project, a man that he was sure he would be loyal to him, and would not disclose the fakery, for the simple reason that this man was indebted to Kennedy as Kennedy was protecting him from justice, as had previous Presidents all the way back to the end of WWII.
• Eén van de vijanden van JFK was David Rockefeller. Hier komen we bij de "oil deplation allowance"
  So JFK had made a deadly enemy out of the oil industry and its biggest tycoon, the Zio-globalist, David Rockefeller with the proposal to reduce the oil depletion allowance. Of the two banks which together controlled 53% of the Federal Reserve in 1963, Rockefeller owned the controlling interest in both.
• En dan is er natuurlijk Vietnam waar Kennedy zich liet verleiden tot het omverwerpen van de leider van Zuid-Vietnam, Diem, nochtans een bondgenoot en net als JFK een Katholiek:
  The reason why JFK, after many months of debates and much indecision, very reluctantly authorised something so utterly distasteful, overthrowing an ally who was a personal acquaintance and fellow Catholic, is clear. He wanted a stronger response by the South Vietnamese military against the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese armies. He desperately hoped that this might be brought about by new leaders of the South Vietnamese government and if so, Kennedy hoped then that the US may be able to withdraw at some point. It was though, much more of a hope, than a firm plan.
• En er was ook nog Laos, waar Kennedy al snel in conflict kwam met de CIA:
  On the government side, the two main Golden Triangle runners were Ted Shackley and Thomas Clines, the same two men who ran Operation Mongoose (the plot to kill Fidel Castro.) Thus, from 1960-1975, the CIA deployed a secret force of 30,000 Hmong tribesmen to fight the Laotian Communists. They also created heroin labs in this area and then shipped it via their own private airline – Air America.
• Zat Lyndon Johnson achter de moord? Hamer is sceptisch, en wijst naar een andere kandidaat:
  At present, the popular view is to pin blame for the assassination on former Vice President Lyndon Johnson. The ‘LBJ Killed JFK’ theme is rampant. But amidst the repetitive cacophony from the controlled media — sometimes echoed even in the ‘alternative’ media — that Lyndon B. Johnson was the mastermind behind the murder of John F. Kennedy – a growing number of dissident, independent voices are daring to beg to differ. For instance, Maurice Philipps, an otherwise unheralded Canadian researcher and writer, through his 1996 book De Dallas á Montreal (From Dallas to Montreal) — uncovered the never-before-revealed Rothschild banking dynasty connections to a key player linked to the JFK conspiracy.
  Colonel Clay Shaw was actually the only man prosecuted for the assassination of JFK. His associate on the Board of MOSSAD (the Israeli Secret Service) front, Permindex, was Louis Bloomfield, a long-time Rothschild ‘gofer.’ “The government’s handling of the investigation of John Kennedy’s murder was a fraud. It was the greatest fraud in the history of our country. It probably was the greatest fraud ever perpetrated in the history of humankind. That doesn’t mean that we have to accept the continued existence of the kind of government which allows this to happen. We can do something about it. We’re forced either to leave this country or to accept the authoritarianism that has developed – the authoritarianism which tells us that in the year 2029 we can see the evidence about what happened to John Kennedy.” Jim Garrison, (from his closing speech at the trial of Clay Shaw, 28th February 1969)
  The Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank and related companies finance the opium / heroin trade. In this, they are acting as designated agents of the British Crown through the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA.) And not only do they control the expatriate Chinese, useful puppets of the opium trade, but they do so as part of an agreement negotiated between Mao Tse-tung and the Royal Institute of International Affairs, by the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank’s leading representatives! Incidentally, the gold and diamonds side of the dirty-money-laundering operations, under the immediate control of Britain’s Zionist Hofjuden (Court Jews,) is part of the very same machinery.
  Documents unearthed by the Canadian author Maurice Philipps demonstrate beyond question that Clay Shaw’s associate on the board of Permindex (its chief executive officer and primary shareholder), Louis Bloomfield of Montreal, was a long-time attorney for the Rothschild dynasty, particularly for Baron Edmund de Rothschild of London, going back as far as World War two.
  Having studied Bloomfield’s private files, which Bloomfield donated to the Canada National Archives, Philipps found what he describes as “many documents” revealing the Rothschild and Israel connection. The Israeli connection is no surprise. The Rothschild’s have been Israel’s foremost patrons from the very beginning – indeed going back to the very advent of Zionism in the 1870s and continuing through the Balfour Declaration in 1917, through to Israel’s illegitimate founding in 1948 and beyond. In addition, Bloomfield and Montreal liquor baron Sam Bronfman, the head of the World Jewish Congress, were among a clique of ‘money kings’ who, in the 1950s bankrolled Israel’s secret nuclear arms programme.
  According to a book published by Executive Intelligence Review called Dope Inc.: The Book That Drove Kissinger Crazy, Permindex was funded by the Canadian Bronfman family and the wealthy Polish Radziwill family. The Permindex chief, MI6 SOE Colonel Sir William Stephenson, had earlier deployed the Meyer Lansky syndicate and helped rehabilitate Lucky Luciano and the SOE Colonel Louis Mortimer Bloomfield was an OSS (CIA forerunner) veteran and Bronfman liaison who had chaired Permindex from its 1958 founding in Montreal and Geneva. Furthermore, the SOE and Permindex insider, General Julius Klein ran guns to the murderous Haganah Zionist terrorist group at the time that the Zionists were attempting to appropriate Palestine for the purpose of founding Israel in the late 1940s. He also ‘handled’ Buffalo mob-boss Max Fischer and Carl Lindner at United Brands, whose banana boats, according to the DEA, regularly shipped cocaine to the US.
  Other SOE members included David Sarnoff, whose RCA conglomerate at that time formed the core of the US National Security Agency; and Walter Sheridan, who provided intelligence to Resorts International and fugitive financier Robert Vesco. However, the most familiar member of SOE was none other than Colonel Clay Shaw, whose son of the same name was a Florida Congressman serving on a House Narcotics task force.
• Wie was Major Louis Mortimer Bloomfield?
  Bloomfield was a man of many ‘hats.’ He was a founding partner of the prestigious Hofjuden law firm of Phillips, Vineberg, Bloomfield and Goodman, the firm that represented and controlled the Bronfman family holdings. Bloomfield’s name was later formally removed from the company’s letterhead in 1968 after the de Gaulle exposures of his Permindex assassination bureau threatened to create an embarrassment. Such cosmetic gestures, however, have little significance in the murky world of international politics where the most prestigious names all appear among the boards of directors of such evil organisations.
  Amongst his business holdings, Major Bloomfield controlled the Israeli Continental Corporation, the Canadian subsidiary of the Dutch Heineken breweries and Credit Suisse of Canada, a correspondent bank to the Credit Suisse of Geneva that was among the holding agencies exposed by SDECE for laundering ‘hit money’ to the OAS. All these corporations were openly listed among the investors in Permindex. As was his law partner, Lazarus Phillips, and his clients, the Bronfmans, Major L. M. Bloomfield was a prominent Zionist ‘philanthropist.’ Amongst his numerous honorary positions, he was the chairman of the Histadrut Campaign of Canada, which collected ‘charitable contributions’ and then passed them on to Israel. Curiously, these funds were discovered on several occasions to have found their way back to Permindex after recycling through the Histadrut’s Bank Hapoalim.
  Bloomfield’s ‘charitable’ activities extended into his chairmanship of the Canadian Red Cross Ambulance Service, a position traditionally held by a top-ranking Knight in the Queen’s official chivalric order, the Most Venerable Order of St. John of Jerusalem. As an operating arm of the Sovereign Order, the Red Cross Ambulance Service has often been named as a front for terrorism. Although known for its more ‘charitable’ functions – which includes selling donated blood for around $200 per pint – the Red Cross is unofficially an intelligence arm of the British Crown.
  So, Bloomfield worked under the cover of the Israeli Continental Corporation and the Canadian subsidiary of Heineken brewery. He controlled the Ran Histadrut ‘charity,’ which at the time constituted 33% of Israel’s GNP and Bank Hapoalim, Israel’s second largest bank and Mossad conduit.
• Verdere connecties met Israël:
  A primary Permindex shareholder and the chief depository for its funds, the Banque De Credit Internationale [BCI] of Geneva, was the fiefdom of Tibor Rosenbaum, a Mossad arms procurement official, who is often referred-to as one of Israel’s ‘founding fathers.’
  BCI was also the chief money-launderer for the crime syndicate of Israeli loyalist Meyer Lansky, a trusted business partner of the aforementioned Sam Bronfman, associate of Louis Bloomfield and the Rothschilds. In fact, Lansky’s Israeli biographers noted that “after Israel became a state, almost 90% of its purchases of arms abroad, were channelled through Rosenbaum’s bank. The financing of many of Israel’s most daring secret operations was carried out through the funds in BCI.”
  Banister was the owner of a New Orleans office building at 544 Camp Street that housed a number of Division Five fronts and groups under close D-5 surveillance. These included the left-radical Fair Play for Cuba Committee and the violently anti-Castro Free Cuba Committee. Lee Harvey Oswald was alternately a member of both these groups during various stages of his ‘laundering.’
  And according to the previously mentioned book, Dope Inc., Tibor Rosenbaum’s BCI was a key bank in the assassination of Kennedy, complicit in the transferring of funds from Bank Hapoalim to New Orleans FBI Division Five station chief Guy Banister. Banister’s agent, Jerry Brooks Gaitlin doled-out the cash to Hunt and his Cuban team of assassins and both Banister and Gaitlin died in very mysterious circumstances – as we will see.
• Permindex, Ferenc Nagy, Guy Banister:
  Those present at these meetings included Ferenc Nagy, a WWII cabinet minister in the pro-Hitler Horthy government of Hungary, who later became Hungarian Prime Minister, and who at one time was himself president of Permindex. Nagy provided money for the secret army organisation, which attempted to assassinate Charles de Gaulle and no doubt significantly, Nagy was seen on the grassy knoll in Dallas on the 22nd November 1963.
  All of those present at the Tryall meeting were executives of Permindex, whose board members included Roy Cohn, former general counsel to Senator Joe McCarthy, Montreal crime boss Joe Bonnano, Mussolini’s Agriculture Minister Count Guitierez de Spadafora of the Italian House of Savoy, Hapsburg and Wittelsbach family banker Hans Seligman of Basel, Carlo d’Amelio, Rome attorney for the Houses of Savoy and Pallavicini, King Farouk of Egypt’s uncle, Munir Chourbagi, and Guiseppe Zigiotti, head of the Italian Fascist Association for Militia Arms.
  Perversely enough, Kennedy was scheduled to speak at the Dallas Trademart – a Permindex affiliate – the day he was murdered.
• Waar kwamen de wapens vandaan voor de moord? Van een CIA-gelieerde onderneming.
  According to several researchers, the weapons for the Kennedy coup came through Schlumberger Wells Services, a company with a history of storing and supplying weapons and explosives for the CIA and the seven-shooter hit team consisted of an elite group put together by J. Edgar Hoover and Sir William Stephenson. The team was formed through the American Council of Christian Churches (ACCC), which Bloomfield, Stephenson and Hoover founded as cover for US and British intelligence via ACCC Latin American missions.
• Interessante figuren in Claw Shaw's adresboek:
  But perhaps the most interesting phone number in Shaw’s address book belonged to Sir Steven Runciman, an elite historian with insider knowledge of the Knights Templar and their Priory of Sion inner sanctum, whilst Warren Commission Chairman Earl Warren, John J. McCloy, Allen Dulles, J. Edgar Hoover and Gerald Ford were all 33rd Degree Illuminised Freemasons. To repeat, for the avoidance of doubt, the rabbit hole is very convoluted and goes very, very deep indeed! But at least how and why Clay Shaw of New Orleans ended-up in the Permindex operation is no longer a mystery. Shaw’s closest friends, who provided the funds for his defence against Garrison’s accusations, the powerful Stern family, leaders of the New Orleans Jewish community, were primary shareholders in the Apollo, Pennsylvania-based NUMEC nuclear facility from which American nuclear material was illicitly channelled to Israel with the collaboration of CIA chief of counterintelligence, James Jesus Angleton, a devoted ally of Israel and head of the CIA’s Mossad desk. Though often avoiding the Mossad connection, many researchers now believe that Angleton was the key figure (of the CIA faction) in the JFK conspiracy. The Sterns also owned WDSU radio and television stations, which hyped Lee Harvey Oswald as a ‘pro-Castro agitator’ at precisely the time Shaw was acting as a handler for Oswald in the summer of 1963 and while Oswald was in New Orleans being set up as the ‘patsy’ in the conspiracy.
• Wie waren de schutters?
  The actual task of executing Kennedy, fell to a unit of Britain’s MI6 intelligence service, the aforementioned Special Operations Executive (SOE) headed by Sir William Stephenson. In addition, the Crown, the British monarchy and their Rothschild ruling elite, the Committee of 300 were all involved. It was an ‘Executive Action’ undertaken at the highest possible level.
• Over Roger Craig:
  Craig’s refusal to change his story about the Mauser, even though all the other officers had capitulated under pressure, caused him to be ostracised by his peers. He was eventually fired from the Dallas Police in 1967, after several years of harassment, ostensibly for ‘discussing sensitive information with a journalist,’ which may or may not have been true, but Roger Craig never found steady work again. His wife left him as a result of this and then he began suffering a series of bizarre accidents, one of which left him severely injured. He was shot at, driven off the road, and at one point his car engine mysteriously exploded. The injuries induced by these incidents left Craig in almost constant physical pain and so in 1975, in order to end his suffering, Roger Craig allegedly took his own life. Whether this is the real truth or whether his name should appear in a very long list of other deaths related to the assassination, is a matter for conjecture. The real truth will probably never be known, unfortunately.
• Over Dimitri von Mohrenschildt:
  Dimitri von Mohrenschildt was a star player in this game, on a somewhat exalted level. He found sponsorship for a role as an academic and publisher specialising in anti-Bolshevik materials and later became involved in more ambitious propaganda work with Radio Liberty and Radio Free Europe. However, his younger brother George was more willing to get his hands dirty. He took a job in the New York office of a French perfume company called Chevalier Garde, named for the Czar’s most elite troops, the Imperial Horse Guards.
• Waren er twee Oswalds?
  Contradictions in New York school records as published by the Warren Commission and those of the New York courts. An apparent disagreement in Oswald’s height, as reported by a court-employed psychiatrist, and as noticed by acquaintances in Texas just a few months later (as detailed above, previously.) Discrepancies over the number of times the youthful Oswald was confined in a youth home. ‘Lee Oswald’ known to be living in New York, while a ‘Harvey Oswald’ is known to be living in Stanley, North Dakota. A friend’s recollection that Oswald had a tooth knocked out when he was punched in the mouth, but dental records of the ‘Oswald’ exhumed in 1981 showing no missing teeth, nor evidence of teeth being chipped or capped.
• Over de Zapruderfilm:
  Over the years, the Zapruder film has been subjected to massive scrutiny. It is said to both prove Oswald’s guilt – or his innocence* (*delete as appropriate) and has been claimed as a fake and/or that it was tampered-with and altered. No other film in history has been so controversial and the debates about what the Zapruder film proves or disproves rage-on to this day. Looking at the Kennedy assassination from an investigative perspective is like falling into a bottomless pit of contradictory evidence and ‘smoke and mirrors.’ But along with prominent JFK researchers like James Fetzer and Harris E. Livingstone, I believe that the Zapruder film is a complete forgery and a vital part of the cover-up of the conspiracy. To back-up that statement is not easy in print, so I would strongly recommend that you research this for yourself. There is a wealth of information, and disinformation on the subject to be found on the Internet and hopefully this book will help you to discern the difference.
  In 1963, Abraham Zapruder of Russian descent, was a 32nd degree Mason, one degree below the top, illuminati level, the 33rd degree, and indeed was no ordinary bystander. He was an active member of two CIA-backed organisations, the Dallas Council on World Affairs, founded by Henry Neil Mallon (George H.W. Bush’s mentor,) a member of the Skull and Bones Society at Yale and, the Crusade for a Free Europe. Membership of these two CIA-backed domestic operations in Dallas included Clint Murchison, the Big-Oil baron and D. Harold Byrd, owner of the Texas School Book Depository, Sarah Hughes, who swore-in LBJ as 36th President whilst Air Force One, the Presidential jet, was still on the ground in Dallas, George de Mohrenschildt, CIA contract agent and friend of Lee Harvey Oswald, George H.W. Bush close friend of George de Mohrenschildt, Howard Hunt and George de Mohrenschildt’s brother, Dimitri von Mohrenschildt. Co-incidence? I do not think so, somehow. In 1953 and 1954, a woman named Jeanne LeGon worked side-by-side with Abraham Zapruder at Nardis of Dallas, a fashion design firm. Jeanne LeGon designed clothing and Abraham Zapruder, the patterns and materials. Zapruder’s obituary mis-states the date he left Nardis of Dallas, incorrectly citing 1949, the correct year was 1959 ... the same year that his design partner Jeanne LeGon became known as Jeanne LeGon de Mohrenschildt after marrying Lee Oswald’s best friend-to-be, the CIA contract agent and rabid anti-communist, George de Mohrenschildt. Lyndon Baines Johnson’s personal secretary, Marie Fehmer, who travelled back to Washington on Air Force One with the newly-sworn-in president LBJ, on the 22nd November 1963, was the daughter of Olga Fehmer, who also worked at Nardis of Dallas with Abraham Zapruder and Jean LeGon de Mohrenschildt. On the 29th March 1977, the very day that de Mohrenschildt was to be interviewed by the House Select Committee on Assassinations, he was found by his daughter, Alexandra, dead of a shotgun blast through the mouth. His death was ruled as ‘suicide.’ Is this all becoming ever-so-slightly suspicious yet?
• Lyndon B. Johnson: Zionist!
  It is absolutely significant in my view, that Lyndon B. Johnson was an ardent Zionist and devoted supporter of the state of Israel. His aunt, Jessie Johnson Hatcher, who was a major influence on him, was a member of the Zionist Organization of America. Whilst it seems highly likely, although unproven that his family was in fact Jewish, there is absolutely no question that Lyndon Johnson was a high-level Zionist who had been involved for decades with the Jewish, Freemasonic organisation, the International Order of the B’nai B’rith, in the illegal immigration of Jews from Poland to Galveston, known as ‘Operation Texas.’
  The B’nai B’rith was behind the plan to bring Jews from Poland to Texas and Johnson, as a new congressman, was a key player in this operation and broke the law to facilitate the illegal immigration scheme. Historians have lately revealed that Johnson, while serving as a young congressman around 1938 or 1939, arranged for illegal, fraudulent visas to be supplied to Jews in Warsaw and oversaw the apparently illegal immigration of hundreds of Jews through the port of Galveston, Texas. In this operation, Johnson was working with the Zionist elders of the B’nai B’rith, not through normal government offices, but totally independently. Enough money could buy false passports and fake visas in Cuba, Mexico and other Latin American countries and Johnson used this method to smuggle many boatloads and planeloads of European Jews into Texas.
  After all, it was in fact Johnson who originally formed the intimate bond between the United States and Israel, which would, over the space of four decades turn the US into both Israel’s lapdog and its Rottweiler, simultaneously. It is also an established fact that Johnson had been the Zionists’ choice of Democratic candidate in the 1960 election primaries and that was not the first time he had been backed politically by Zionists. His campaign for a Senate seat in 1948 was masterminded by the Zionist, Abraham Feinberg, the financial godfather of Israel’s atomic bomb. During the Suez Crisis in 1957, Johnson had used his position as leader of the Democratic majority in the house, to lead a successful campaign to stop President Eisenhower from supporting UN sanctions aimed at forcing Israel to back-down on the issue. He even wrote an open letter to Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, which he had endorsed by the Senate Democratic Policy Committee and published in the New York Times on 20th February 1957.